Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Correlation = 1)  causality; 2) spurious; or 3) reverse causality?   You decide…..

Source: Bond Vigilantes

This entry was posted in Bonds, PIIGS, Sovereign Risk and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Post hoc ergo propter hoc

  1. David Jones's avatar David Jones says:

    I suppose you could substitute “southern climate” for young men living at home and get the same results. Ireland would be the same outlier that it is now.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.