Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Correlation = 1)  causality; 2) spurious; or 3) reverse causality?   You decide…..

Source: Bond Vigilantes

This entry was posted in Bonds, PIIGS, Sovereign Risk and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Post hoc ergo propter hoc

  1. David Jones says:

    I suppose you could substitute “southern climate” for young men living at home and get the same results. Ireland would be the same outlier that it is now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.