Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – February 17

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cost Of Thriving Index & Middle-Class Inflation

Good piece in the Washington Post today on the “cost of thriving index  (COTI),” which provides some granular insight into how America’s middle class is faring.  

…(COTI), which starts from a simple premise: Americans must prioritize five sets of goods when providing for their family. That includes food, housing, health care, transportation and higher education. Those who can pay for those needs without worry can enjoy some luxuries without risking their children’s future.

COTI is an attempt to measure how the median American family is doing in obtaining that goal. It looks at the cost of those five items in 1985 and today and compares them with the median wage for a man 25 years or older working full-time. It then calculates the number of weeks it would take for that person to pay for the five items.  – Washington Post

Back in 1985, for example, it took 39.7 weeks of work to pay for COTI basket versus 62.1 weeks of work today to cover the same expenses. 

My dissertation research (unfinished) was on the “Dusenberry effect,”  where consumers try to maintain their standard of living by, say, moving from one income earner in the household to two.  The data show exactly that.  It now takes two incomes in the median household to maintain the standard of living that one income earner could provide in the mid-1980s.   

The data also help explain why the country’s political and economic mood is so dour.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Charts That Explain All Things Macro

In our opinion, the economy’s unexpected mojo and sticky inflation can be explained in two simple macro charts.  M2 as a percent of GDP remains freakishly high, though we don’t put much stock in the old monetary aggregates, and Household Wealth as a percent of GDP remains off the historical charts.  

Two of the deadly inflationary sins:

1) Money for nothing
2) Wealth without production 

Levels matter.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Woke Joke Of The Day

Wow!  The wing-nuts are coming for AI and ChatGPT…err…WokeGPT.

Prepare for an invasion of the Luddites

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, for instance, has called attention to conservative complaints that the AI refused to write a song praising him, but it did so for Fidel Castro. – Bloomberg BW Daily

Not that the new generative AI chatbots are without sin….

Mistakes are inevitable, because large language models don’t have any inherent sense of truth. ChatGPT has a tendency, when confronted with a question it can’t answer, to simply make up something. These “hallucinations,” as AI experts call them, can be extremely convincing. Last year, Meta Platforms Inc. pulled down a large language model known as Galactica, which was supposed to be “a curated corpus of humanity’s scientific knowledge,” after critics pointed out it had a tendency to invent science behind queries such as “the benefits of eating crushed glass.”  –  Bloomberg BW Daily

DALL-E 2An Andy Warhol painting of Luddites smashing a computer

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – February 10

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Three Game Theory Tactics | Big Think

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Game On: The AI Race Enters Second Lap

We are reposting a quote that has stayed near and dear to us for the past three years. 

QOTD: Artificial Intelligentsia

Originally Posted on  by macromon

QOTD = Quote of the Day

Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere [A.I.] will become the ruler of the world – Vladimir Putin

The race to end all races (double entendre?) is starting to permeate the social psyche. 

Vlad warned us in his quote we posted almost three years prior.  He knows what is at stake.   

It’s amazing how the release of a new generative chatbot can set off such a flurry.   

Here’s the current header at the Drudge Report.

Fresh off my DALL-E 2 easel:   “An expressive oil painting of an economist getting it wrong.”

Hot off my Chat GPT press:  Who will win the AI race?

Chat GPT: 

It’s difficult to predict who will “win” the race in the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI), as the term “winning” is subjective and can mean different things to different people.

From a technological perspective, AI is a rapidly evolving field and many countries and corporations are making significant investments in research and development. As a result, there are likely to be multiple leaders in different areas of AI, such as natural language processing, computer vision, and machine learning.

From a geopolitical perspective, some countries, such as the United States, China, and Europe, are investing heavily in AI and positioning themselves as global leaders in the field. However, the competition in this area is complex and dynamic, and it is possible that new players could emerge and have a significant impact on the development and deployment of AI.

Ultimately, the “winner” of the AI race will depend on a wide range of factors, including the quality and impact of research and development, the availability of talent and resources, the strength of innovation ecosystems, and the level of investment and support from governments, corporations, and other stakeholders.

It’s also worth noting that the concept of “winning” the AI race may not be the most useful or appropriate way to think about the development and deployment of AI. Instead of focusing on who is “winning” or “losing,” it may be more productive to consider how AI can be developed and deployed in a way that benefits humanity as a whole and addresses the challenges and opportunities posed by this rapidly evolving technology.

Prepare to get nonlinear, folks.  This going to be an exciting race  Don’t miss out. 

Posted in Quote of the Day, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – February 3

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Monetary Levels Matter

We hear a lot of chatter these days about how the money supply, as defined by M2, is now contracting at an unprecedented rate.  We don’t put much stock in the monetary aggregates as the functional term, and variable “money” is now very difficult to define and measure. 

Nevertheless, we don’t entirely dismiss the monetary aggregates but come on, man, they were designed for an economy and financial system in the Flinstone Age where commercial banks ran the show.  The advances in FinTech and globalization have rendered the old aggregates…well…maybe just a step above Barney Rubble.  

GMM loosely defines money as an asset that can directly or indirectly provide the firepower to purchase goods and services.  In our definition, we include changes in wealth, such as stock market capitalization, cryptocurrencies,  home equity, and stock options, to name a few.   

As a graduate student working for the US G (not quite back in the Flinstone Age), I attended seminars where policy markers contemplated including stock market mutual funds in the monetary aggregates. 

M2 Water Levels Are Still Very High

The following charts drill down on the M2 monetary aggregate so wildly touted by the financial media.  

Yes, M2 is now contracting year-on-year but from such a high and overflowing level.  In other words, measures in M2 changes are affected by a “base effect” as the dam may not be overflowing anymore, but the water (money) levels still remain incredibly high.  

Though the Fed has raised the price of money significantly in the past year, the quantity of “money” remains close to historic highs and freakishly above its long-term norm relative to the economy.  Coupled with the purchasing firepower of Chinese households, who have accumulated $2.6tn of excess savings in the form of bank deposits last year alone, we believe it’s way too early to break out in song, “Ding Dong! Inflation is dead.”  

We must learn and recognize that using flight instruments designed for the Spirit of St. Louis is not a very efficient way to navigate a modern-day F-35 fighter jet through a very foggy economy. 

Stay frosty, folks!  

ChatGPT Defines “Money”

Here is the result of our ChatGPT query,

GMM:  Define in 500 words what is money.

ChatGPT: Money is a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value that is widely used as a means of payment for goods and services. It is a fundamental concept in economics and plays a critical role in facilitating transactions in an economy.

Money serves as a medium of exchange by providing a common currency that is acceptable to both the buyer and the seller. This eliminates the need for a barter system, where goods and services are traded directly for other goods and services, and enables economic transactions to take place more efficiently.

Money also acts as a unit of account by providing a standard measure of value that is used to price goods and services. This allows for easier comparison between different goods and services and enables individuals to make informed decisions about how to allocate their resources.

Finally, money serves as a store of value by providing a way for individuals to preserve their purchasing power over time. This allows people to save for future expenditures and to invest in assets that may appreciate in value.

There are several forms of money, including physical currency, such as coins and banknotes, and digital money, such as electronic transfers and digital wallets. Central banks and governments play an important role in the supply and regulation of money in an economy.

Throughout history, different forms of money have been used, including precious metals such as gold and silver, as well as paper money and bank deposits. In modern times, most economies operate on a fiat money system, where the money is not backed by a physical commodity but is instead accepted as a means of payment by agreement within the community.

In conclusion, money is a critical component of any modern economy and plays a fundamental role in facilitating transactions, acting as a unit of account, and preserving purchasing power over time. The form of money used, as well as the mechanisms for its supply and regulation, can have a significant impact on the functioning of an economy and its overall stability.

 
 
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

S&P 500 Breaks Out

All kinds of technical reasons to be bullish. 

As we noted Friday, watch for a break out above the 4100.96, the December high, and the top of the trading range. .  The index traded almost to its key .50 fib at 4155.10 before backing off into the close.

Gun to head?  Market bangs around, consolidating gains before a move to 4325, the August high.  Have mercy on us, as we have never learned predicting short-term market moves is a mug’s game.  

Dare we say…um…disinflation has bottomed?  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment