Inflation With A Draghi Tatoo?

During this morning’s ECB press conference,  Super Mario sent a clear message to the markets:  the ECB’s printing press, QE, is a permanent fixture in the central bank’s arsenal or “toolbox.”   If you’re not inferring from his words that inflation is the end game, what are you thinking?

Why isn’t QE effective in Venezuela or Argentina?

Maybe because the countries’ central banks went to to the well (printed money) too many times in the past wrecking confidence and demand for the local currency.

The reserve status of a currency, which, by itself, generates intrinsic demand, does not last forever and demand is not infinite.

Inflation The End Game

That is why, listening to Mario and other central bankers, we believe inflation is the end game, folks.   Not yet,  and maybe not the next crisis.

There will be, most certainly, a few big deflation scares in the interim,  which will sow the seeds of the big inflation as the central bankers fire up the printing presses again and again.  Probably in the form of some kind of “People’s QE” monetizing unfunded pension liabilities and a universal basic income (UBI).

We are not taking a political position for or against the pension fix or UBI, but are fairly certain it won’t accomplish what policymakers think if funded by QE.

The advanced economies need structural fixes starting with dealing with the huge and growing disparity of wealth and income.


It’s Kafkaesque that market pundits and the POTUS are screaming at the Fed to stop raising rates with a zero real Fed funds rate.  Something is rotten in the state of  Denmark  the economy, folks.

No more cyclical tools to fix structural problems.   Let’s get it on with it.

This entry was posted in Banking, Monetary Policy, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Inflation With A Draghi Tatoo?

  1. mike oxbig says:

    you have hit the nails on the head

    but it does not matter

    nobody in authority will pay any attention to what you said

    the deep staters will do what they want to do regardless


    end of story

  2. louisrwoodhill says:

    On the question of whether “money” is too tight or to loose, Trump is right and Powell is wrong. On the question of what should be done with interest rates, they are both wrong. The Fed should not target interest rates at all. It should target the CRB Index, which at 180 or so, is much too low. The Fed should bring the CRB Index up to 250 and just keep it at that level forever.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.