Prof G. Dishes on the Election

This is by far the best analysis of the election we have seen.  Professor Scott Galloway of NYU is excellent.  Click on the video, and your 7 minutes will be well rewarded.

Click here to view the video. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – November 8

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ROTD: Inflation Chickens Came Home To Roost

ROTD = Requote of the Day


Inflation is way too high given extremely easy financial and monetary conditions.  There will be blood…the Democrats should begin to worry. – Global Macro Monitor, June 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taleb on Fragility of Markets, Political Risk, AI

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – November 1

Bearish Bonds

  • Jobs Report Impact: October’s weaker jobs report initially pushed yields down, hinting at possible accelerated Fed rate cuts, before a quick rebound.
  • Political Influence: Anticipated election outcomes, including potential stimulus under a new administration, could reintroduce inflationary pressures, potentially raising yields.
  • Fed Rate Expectations: Markets expect quarter-point Fed rate cuts in November and December, with a potential pause by early next year.
  • Treasury Auctions: Large-scale auctions for three-year, 10-year, and 30-year notes next week may pressure yields further amid heightened volatility.
  • Market Volatility: Bond market volatility is at its highest this year, with hedging activity spiking due to election and Fed-related uncertainties.
 

U.S. Treasury yields initially declined following Friday’s unexpectedly weak October employment report but rebounded sharply as traders discounted the distortions in the jobs data. Only 12,000 jobs were added in October, a significant slowdown from September’s revised gain of 223,000.

The 10-year Treasury yield, trading around 4.30% before the report, dropped to 4.23% before bouncing back to close the week at 4.37%, marking its highest level since July. Investors were quick to reassess the October report, noting that external factors, including hurricanes and strikes, likely affected the data.

October proved challenging for global bond markets, with yields rising worldwide. Speculation surrounding the U.S. election and the potential for not-so-bond-friendly fiscal policies of the new administration could heighten inflationary pressures. We highlighted these risks to the bond markets in our recent post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

OQOTD: Tail Risk Delusion

OQOTD: Ominous Quote of the Day

By making Mr Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace. We cannot quantify the chance that something will go badly wrong: nobody can. But we believe voters who minimise it are deluding themselves. – The Economist

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bond Market Fundamentals: Rising Risks

  • QT Scale: G10 central banks reduced balance sheets from $28 trillion to $21.5 trillion since March 2022.
  • Interconnected Risks: Simultaneous QT across central banks could spread funding stress across markets.
  • Bond Market Volatility: Shifting bond ownership to price-sensitive investors could increase volatility.
  • U.S. Treasury Impact: Increased free float Treasury securities could drive yields and volatility up.
  • Short-Term Debt Strategy: Treasury’s short-term debt issuance lowers current costs but risks future financing hikes.
  • Dealer Inventory Risks: Large dealer inventories may hinder sell-off absorption, heightening volatility in downturns.

The International Monetary Fund has raised a cautionary alert on an issue we’ve highlighted at the Global Macro Monitor for years: the supply-demand dynamics of the U.S. Treasury market. We maintain that Treasury yields will face sustained upward pressure due to a significant increase in net issuance, rising from less than 3% of GDP—at times even negative after the Fed absorbed more than the entire annual net issuance—to well over 10% of GDP.

Additionally, the shift in bond ownership toward more price-sensitive investors and away from the largest buyers for the past few decades – the Fed and global central banks – will continue to drive volatility in government bond markets, particularly if issuance rises further to fund expanding fiscal deficits.

In the U.S., quantitative tightening (QT) has raised the proportion of free-float Treasury securities, a trend expected to gradually push yields and volatility higher. Furthermore, the Treasury’s increased reliance on shorter-term debt to manage immediate borrowing costs may lead to higher financing expenses over time. Large dealer inventories also pose a medium-term risk, as these holdings could limit dealers’ capacity to absorb Treasury sales in adverse market conditions, potentially amplifying sell-offs.

Finally, given the lack of spending restraint or public debt concerns among both presidential candidates, the likelihood of a “Liz Truss moment” in Washington next year is significantly higher than current pricing reflects. 

How to know?   Watch real yields and term premiums. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Lost In Aggregation: American Middle Class

While U.S. macroeconomic indicators—such as GDP growth, corporate profits, and stock market performance—signal prosperity, these metrics often obscure the reality facing the middle class. Aggregate data masks wage stagnation, rising cost-of-living pressures, and increasing debt burdens that are disproportionately felt by middle-income households. This discrepancy is significant, as middle-class financial strain limits consumer spending growth—a key economic driver. Data aggregation can dilute such nuances, so a closer examination of income distribution, real wage growth, and regional economic variations may reveal potential vulnerabilities in sectors heavily reliant on middle-class spending stability and resilience.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Japan Political Earthquake: LDP Tanks

Key Facts

  • The LDP coalition lost its majority, holding only 214 of the 233 required seats.
  • Voter dissatisfaction stems from years of stagnant wages and rising costs.
  • The loss is the LDP’s worst electoral result since 2009.
  • Ishiba, newly appointed, is under pressure to resign and could become Japan’s shortest-serving leader.
  • Market analysts expect heightened volatility due to the political uncertainty.
  • The CDPJ gained seats, focusing on the LDP’s recent slush-fund scandal.
  • Turnout was low (53.8%), with young voters increasingly disillusioned by mainstream politics.

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) faced a significant setback in today’s snap election, losing its parliamentary majority for the first time in 15 years. Far worse than anticipated, this outcome has thrust the country into political turmoil. The election, called by new Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba amid a slush-fund scandal, was an attempt to secure public support but resulted in voter backlash over stagnant wages and rising living costs. As a result, the LDP will struggle to govern, facing possible policy gridlock and pressure for Ishiba’s resignation. Economic analysts caution that this upheaval could lead to market volatility and complicate Japan’s reform agenda. The main opposition, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), capitalized on public discontent, securing significant gains.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Not So Fertile Crescent

         Source:  VisualCapitalist

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment