The following Tweet is startling. Dr. Feigl-Ding is from Harvard.
Make sure to watch the video we posted earlier for background on defining R0.
The following Tweet is startling. Dr. Feigl-Ding is from Harvard.
Make sure to watch the video we posted earlier for background on defining R0.
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD – the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! How bad is that reproductive R0 value? It is thermonuclear pandemic level bad – never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in my entire career. I’m not exaggerating… #WuhanCoronovirus #CoronavirusOutbreak pic.twitter.com/6mmxIHL9Ue
— Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding (@DrEricDing) January 25, 2020
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
In economics, things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Email subscribers should always click the website version as many times the original post is edited and updated. Thank you.
Never heard of RO before. Here is what Wikipedia says: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_reproduction_number
Sent from my iPhone
>
Thanks, Larry. That is very useful info. Did you watch the video? Also very good.