Buffett Building Big Buffer: Time to Buckle Up?

Warren Buffett’s recent moves in the stock market signal a strong defensive posture, one that suggests a serious market correction may be on the horizon. Over the past several years, Berkshire Hathaway has been a net seller of equities, shedding over $134 billion in stocks in 2024 alone, particularly trimming its holdings in Apple and Bank of America. Simultaneously, Buffett has amassed an unprecedented $334 billion cash pile, which the Global Macro Monitor estimates to be over 30 percent of BH’s total assets and his largest cash position ever.

“Nothing Looks Compelling”

Buffett’s reluctance to deploy this cash, despite historically favoring equities, underscores his view that the market is dangerously overvalued. The S&P 500 has surged over 20% in consecutive years, yet Buffett has remained on the sidelines, signaling that valuations have exceeded reasonable levels. His repeated assertion that “nothing looks compelling” suggests that he sees few opportunities that justify the risk. Moreover, Berkshire has halted stock buybacks, another indication that Buffett believes prices are stretched.

Steve Cohen Bearish

The broader economic climate supports Buffett’s cautious stance. Steve Cohen, CEO of Point72, has turned bearish for the first time in years, citing rising inflationary pressures due to aggressive tariff policies, a restrictive immigration stance that could constrict the labor force, and federal spending cuts aimed at reducing the deficit. Cohen argues that these factors will slow economic growth from 2.5% to 1.5% in the second half of the year, increasing the likelihood of a market correction. Buffett’s strategy aligns with this outlook: in an environment of deteriorating fundamentals, cash provides a safe haven.

Newsletter to Investors

Buffett’s latest letter to shareholders further reveals his perspective. He openly acknowledges past mistakes in capital allocation and emphasizes the importance of adjusting to changing market conditions. He notes that while Berkshire still holds substantial equities, their marketable securities portfolio has declined from $354 billion to $272 billion, while non-quoted controlled equities have increased. Buffett reiterates that Berkshire will always favor ownership of quality businesses over cash but also warns that economic uncertainties and fiscal irresponsibility can erode paper money’s value.

Not A Market Call?

Notably, Buffett does not explicitly frame his cash hoarding as a market call, yet his actions suggest otherwise. While valuation alone is not a reliable timing mechanism, the alignment of stretched stock prices, macroeconomic risks, and Buffett’s defensive positioning strongly suggests that a significant market correction is imminent. Historically, Buffett has been an opportunistic buyer during downturns, and his current stance implies he is waiting for a major dislocation to deploy capital at more attractive valuations. Given Buffett’s unparalleled market acumen, investors should take heed—this could be a pivotal moment in market history.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – February 21

Key Facts:

  • The S&P 500 (-1.7%), Dow Jones (-2.51%), and Nasdaq (-2.51%) fell this week amid tariff concerns and weak economic data. The Russell 2000 (-3.71%) and Dow Transports (-3.45%) underperformed, reflecting slowing economic activity.

  • Nvidia (+18%) gained on AI demand optimism, a strong Q4 forecast (+72% YoY revenue), and Amazon’s $100B AI investment, while Tesla (-23% from peak) declined due to weak delivery forecasts, China competition, and concerns over Elon Musk’s DOGE involvement.

  • Gold hit an all-time high ($2,954.69/oz), up 11.8% YTD, driven by safe-haven demand and central bank buying. Natural Gas surged 13% this week and 40% in February due to severe winter weather and a 10% U.S. tariff on Canadian energy.

  • U.S. long-term inflation expectations hit 3.5%, the highest since 1995. Retail sales fell 0.9%, while consumer sentiment dropped 10% MoM, raising concerns about spending trends.

  • Germany’s Feb 23 election may lead to “Debt Brake” reforms, increasing government spending. A pro-growth outcome could sustain the DAX’s 11.95% YTD rally, but coalition uncertainty poses risks.

U.S. Markets

  • Major Indices Performance:
    • S&P 500: Declined 1.7% this week but remains up 2.2% YTD.
    • Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA): Fell 2.51% this week, reflecting concerns about tariffs and weaker economic data.
    • Nasdaq Composite: Dropped 2.51%, but remains positive YTD (+1.08%), buoyed by AI optimism despite recent pullbacks.
  • Russell 2000: The small-cap index was hit hardest, falling 3.71% on the week, now down nearly 2% YTD. Weakness in growth-sensitive sectors and rate uncertainty weighed on performance.
  • Dow Transports: Declined 3.45%, impacted by:
    • Weakening U.S. economic data, including a sharp drop in consumer sentiment.
    • Trade concerns, as new tariffs on China and proposed auto tariffs raised cost uncertainty.
    • Sector-wide airline selloff, with Alaska Air (-6.9%), United (-6.4%), and Delta (-5.9%) leading declines.
  • Tesla (TSLA): After an 80% post-election surge, Tesla has now fallen 23% from its January peak of $439.75. However, it remains up 39% since November. Investor sentiment is shifting amid:
    • Weaker Q4 delivery forecasts and concerns over profit margins.
    • China competition fears, as BYD continues to gain market share.
    • Fallout from Elon Musk’s DOGE participation
  • Nvidia (NVDA): Surged 18% this week, making it one of the top performers. Key drivers:
    • Optimism ahead of Q4 earnings (Feb 26), with expected revenue of $20.89B (+72% YoY).
    • Major AI investments from Amazon ($100B in AI infrastructure for 2025), boosting demand for Nvidia’s chips.
    • CEO Jensen Huang reassured investors that AI hardware demand remains strong, downplaying fears of rising competition from Chinese AI firms.
  • Homebuilders ETF (XHB): Declined over 5% this week, driven by:
    • The National Association of Home Builders’ Index falling to a five-month low due to high mortgage rates and construction costs.
    • 25% tariff on Canadian lumber, increasing material costs for new homes.
    • Toll Brothers (-5.9%) posted disappointing earnings, leading to a slower construction forecast in high-inventory regions.

International Markets

  • Europe:
    • STOXX Europe 600: +9.1% YTD, buoyed by lower valuations and strong earnings.
    • DAX (Germany): +11.95% YTD, ahead of the German federal election on Sunday.
    • FTSE 100 (UK): Reached an all-time high (8,807.44) this week.
  • Asia:
    • Japan: Nikkei 225 fell 0.97%, hit, in part, by yen strength and rising Japanese government bond (JGB) yields (10-year at 1.35%) that signals potential tightening from the Bank of Japan.
    • China:
      • CSI 300 (+1.19%) and Hang Seng (+3.79%) surged on AI optimism and expectations of softer U.S. tariffs.
      • However, the property market remains weak, with home sales posting a double-digit decline.
  • Russian Markets:
    • Russian stocks have surged 31.34% YTD, while the Ruble has strengthened 22%. Key drivers:
      • U.S.-Russia relations improved, following Trump-Putin negotiations on Ukraine.
      • Energy strength: Rising oil and gas prices boosted Russia’s trade balance.
      • Central Bank interventions: Currency sales helped support the Ruble.

Commodities:

  • Gold: Reached an all-time high of $2,954.69/oz, up 2% this week and 11.8% YTD. Drivers include:
    • Geopolitical tensions (Russia-Ukraine, U.S.-China trade).
    • Central bank demand, with Goldman Sachs raising its target to $3,100.
  • Natural Gas: Soared 13% on the week, 40% in February, due to:
    • Severe winter storms, increasing heating demand.
    • Supply disruptions, including halted Russian transit.
    • 10% U.S. tariff on Canadian energy, adding cost uncertainty.
    •  

Economics

Domestic:

  • Inflationary Expectations Surging:
    • U.S. long-term inflation expectations hit 3.5%, the highest since 1995.
  • Federal Reserve Policy:
    • Fed Chair Powell reaffirmed a “higher-for-longer” stance on interest rates, delaying the next rate cut expectation into the summer.
    • The 10-year Treasury yield hit 4.66%, reflecting persistent inflation concerns.
  • Consumer Spending Weakness Emerging:
    • Retail Sales fell 0.9%, marking the biggest decline in nearly two years.
    • University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index dropped 10% MoM, with a 19% plunge in durable goods spending sentiment on tariff concerns.
    • Walmart forecasted lower sales and profits for 2025 with the CEO announcing, “We have to acknowledge that we are in an uncertain time, and we don’t want to get out over our skis here.”

International Economy:

  • Europe:
    • German Elections (Feb 23):
      • Debt Brake Reform: Potential fiscal easing could increase government spending on infrastructure and defense.
      • Market Impact: A pro-growth result could sustain the DAX’s rally, but coalition uncertainty remains a risk.
    • UK Inflation Rises to 3.0%:
      • Above 2.5% prior, delaying Bank of England rate cut expectations.
      • Wage growth remains high (5.9% YoY), complicating policy outlook.
  • Asia:
    • Japan’s Inflation at 3.2% YoY:
      • Increases the likelihood of faster BoJ rate hikes.
      • 10-year JGB yields at 15-year highs (1.35%), tightening conditions.
    • China Mixed Inflation Trends:
      • CPI rose 0.5% YoY, signaling potential recovery.
      • PPI remains in deflation at -2.3% YoY, reflecting weak industrial demand.

Week Ahead

  • Key Market Movers:
    • Nvidia Earnings (Feb 26):
      • Q4 revenue expected at $20.89B (+72% YoY).
      • Tech sector impact: AI-driven chip demand outlook remains key.
    • PCE Inflation (Feb 28):
      • Fed’s preferred inflation measure, with implications for rate cut timing.
  • German Election Aftermath:
    • Debt policy clarity could boost European equities.
    • Coalition instability could create market volatility.

Conclusion:

Markets are navigating inflationary pressures, trade risks, and geopolitical tensions, while gold and energy remain strong hedges. The German elections and Nvidia’s earnings will be the most significant catalysts in the coming week.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

German Economy In Crisis | DW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

COTD: Tariff Talk

COTD = Chart of the Day

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is China Leading the Global Tech Race? | BBC

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Happy Presidents Day, NOT!

Key Points:

  • Survey conducted by political scientists from the University of Houston and Coastal Carolina University, with participation from American Political Science Association (APSA) scholars and published experts in presidential studies.
  • Donald Trump is ranked as the lowest-rated U.S. president, falling below Buchanan and Andrew Johnson.
  • His presidency is characterized by institutional challenges, including tensions with the judiciary and oversight agencies.
  • He is identified as the most polarizing president, intensifying partisan divisions and public distrust in institutions.
  • Comparative historical analysis contrasts his governance style with previous controversial administrations, such as Nixon’s.
  • His rejection of electoral outcomes is a key factor in scholarly assessments of democratic resilience.
  • The long-term implications of his presidency remain a subject of ongoing academic debate, particularly regarding executive power and institutional stability.

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey, conducted by Brandon Rottinghaus (University of Houston) and Justin S. Vaughn (Coastal Carolina University), provides an empirical assessment of U.S. presidents from George Washington to Joe Biden. The survey was distributed to current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association (APSA), as well as scholars who have recently published peer-reviewed research in presidential studies. Of the 525 invited experts, 154 provided usable responses, offering an academically rigorous evaluation of presidential leadership.

The survey ranks Donald Trump as the lowest-rated U.S. president, placing him below James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two presidents historically associated with crises that threatened the republic—the Civil War and Reconstruction, respectively. The survey’s findings suggest that Trump’s administration presented significant institutional challenges, contributed to heightened political polarization, and raised concerns about the resilience of U.S. democratic norms.

Institutional Challenges and Democratic Norms

A key finding of the survey is that Trump’s presidency was marked by frequent tensions with democratic institutions. Respondents highlighted his strained relationship with the judiciary, intelligence agencies, and independent oversight bodies, which raised concerns about the separation of powers and the rule of law. The survey results also emphasize the significance of Trump’s post-election actions in 2020, particularly his rejection of electoral outcomes and efforts to challenge election legitimacy. These elements contribute to scholarly debates about the extent to which executive behavior influences democratic stability.

Polarization and Its Consequences

The survey identifies Trump as the most polarizing president in U.S. history. While political polarization is not unique to his tenure, respondents indicated that his presidency exacerbated partisan divisions, particularly in areas such as public trust in institutions, congressional oversight, and executive authority. Political scientists have long analyzed the effects of partisan entrenchment on governance, and the survey’s findings align with broader concerns that polarization may erode institutional effectiveness and democratic consensus.

Comparative Analysis of Presidential Leadership

Presidential greatness rankings are historically shaped by factors such as crisis management, institutional impact, and governance style. Scholars have compared Trump’s administration to those of previous controversial leaders, such as Richard Nixon, whose presidency ended amid the Watergate scandal. However, a key distinction noted in the survey results is that Nixon ultimately resigned in response to institutional pressure, whereas Trump’s refusal to accept electoral defeat and his role in post-election controversies have been central to scholarly assessments of his administration.

Long-Term Implications for Democratic Governance

The survey results raise broader questions about democratic resilience and institutional continuity. Research on democratic erosion often identifies key risk factors, including executive challenges to institutional independence, contested elections, and shifts in political norms. The expert evaluations in this survey suggest that Trump’s presidency aligns with several of these concerns, particularly in relation to election integrity and the evolving scope of executive power. Whether these trends are temporary or indicative of broader institutional shifts remains a subject of ongoing academic inquiry.

Conclusion

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey, conducted by scholars from the University of Houston and Coastal Carolina University, provides an empirically grounded framework for assessing presidential leadership. Trump’s ranking at the bottom of the presidential greatness scale reflects expert concerns about institutional norms, political polarization, and executive conduct. While assessments of presidential effectiveness evolve over time, this study underscores the extent to which Trump’s presidency has influenced discussions on democratic governance, institutional resilience, and the executive branch’s evolving role.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Global Risk Monitor: Week In Review – February 14

U.S. Markets:
The U.S. stock market ended the week with strong gains, nearing record highs despite mixed economic signals. The Nasdaq Composite led with a 2.58% gain, and the S&P 500 followed, closing within 1% of its all-time high. Investor optimism was driven by President Trump’s decision to delay new global tariffs in favor of a “reciprocal tariff” framework to be determined country by country.

The inflation report caused a temporary selloff midweek, but equities rebounded as investors digested Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s comments that policymakers were still assessing inflation’s trajectory. Growth stocks continued to outperform value stocks, while small-cap stocks lagged.

Global Markets:

  • Europe: The STOXX Europe 600 climbed to a record level (+1.78%), supported by positive corporate earnings and speculation about a Ukraine ceasefire deal with Russian concessions. Germany’s DAX (+3.33%) and France’s CAC 40 (+2.58%) led gains.
  • Japan: The Nikkei 225 gained 0.89%, supported by yen weakness and Trump’s decision not to impose new tariffs on Japan.
  • China: The CSI 300 rose 1.19%, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index surged 7.04%, driven by investor interest in tech stocks and AI firms. However, China’s property market remains a major drag, with a double-digit decline in home sales and falling prices.

Economics

U.S. Inflation Data:
January’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) exceeded expectations, rising 0.5% month-over-month and 3.0% year-over-year (previously 2.9%). The core CPI (excluding food and energy) climbed 0.4% MoM, doubling December’s pace. The main driver was shelter costs, which rose 0.4% and contributed to nearly 30% of the inflation increase.

The Producer Price Index (PPI) also came in hot at 0.4% MoM, slightly above consensus. However, healthcare and airfare prices showed signs of cooling, suggesting potential disinflationary forces.

Monetary Policy & Federal Reserve:
In response to inflation concerns, Powell reaffirmed that the Fed is not yet ready to cut rates, shifting expectations for the first rate cut from September to December. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee called the inflation report “sobering,” warning that multiple months of high CPI could delay monetary easing further.

International Economic Trends:

  • Europe: Trade tensions with the U.S. over the reciprocal tariff policy could weigh on euro area growth, though it is unlikely to shift the trade surplus.
  • UK: The British economy grew 0.1% in Q4 2024, surprising analysts. Bank of England officials are debating cautious rate cuts as inflation pressures persist.
  • China: A higher-than-expected 0.5% CPI rise suggests inflation is reappearing, but factory deflation remains entrenched (-2.3% PPI YoY).
  • Emerging Markets: Hungary’s inflation surprised to the upside (+1.5% MoM), lowering chances of imminent rate cuts. India faces higher U.S. tariffs, increasing global trade uncertainty.

    Week Ahead
  • U.S. Markets: Investors will closely watch upcoming data releases, including:
    • Empire State Manufacturing Index (Tuesday)
    • Housing Starts & Building Permits (Wednesday)
    • Philadelphia Fed Index & Jobless Claims (Thursday)
    • Existing Home Sales & University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (Friday)
  • Global Markets & Central Banks:
    • China PMIs (Monday) will provide insights into early-year industrial activity.
    • Bank of Canada policy rate decision (Wednesday) is expected to deliver a 25 bps rate cut.
    • European Central Bank (Thursday) is likely to lower its deposit rate by 25 bps as inflation stabilizes around 2.4% YoY.
  • Market Sentiment:
    • The S&P 500 may test new highs if bond yields remain stable, but inflation concerns could increase volatility.
    • Traders will focus on Nvidia’s earnings (Feb 26) and the upcoming PCE inflation report (Feb 28), the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge.

Conclusion:

Despite hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation data, equity markets showed resilience as investors weighed trade policy uncertainty, monetary policy outlook, and corporate earnings strength. The delay in new tariffs provided short-term relief to markets, but trade fragmentation remains a long-term risk. Next week’s housing and labor data will be key to assessing U.S. economic momentum heading into Q2 2025.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Dark History of Valentine’s Day

Betcha didn’t know this.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Krugman On Shifting Political/Economic Landscape

Interesting interview.  Worth your time. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What’s Inflating, What’s Not…

Wait…Were’t we promised the cost of auto insurance would be cut in half? CPI came in hot this morning.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment