Getting Long Semiconductor ETF – SMH

Going long 5K shares of Semi index, SMH at $96.95.  Stop at $94.77.

Taking another facial with S&P short.   Market trades like its offside as Trump is going to cave on shutdown.   China will sense weakness and play harder, however.

Other trades working well.

May take off S&P short before the close, if not stopped out,  depending on market reaction to POTUS presser.

Levering up trading capital only for short-term but market risk mitigated with S&P short.

trades

 

 

Posted in Trades, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Ten Good Weekend Reads – January 25

weekend_chart_4

  • Fed Officials Weigh Earlier-Than-Expected End to Bond Portfolio Runoff – WSJ
  • The difficulty of being a bear in a bear market – KNect365

“…Making money when everyone else is losing is easier said than done.” – Michael Batnick

  • Has Value Investing Gone Out of Style? – Wisdom Tree

weekend_chart_2

  • Junk Bond Strength is Bullish For Stocks – McClellan Financial Publications
  • The Rules of the Bond Game, Trader Vic – The Epoch Times
  • Venezuela bonds hit highest since 2017 on hopes for political change – CNBC
  • Carry Traders Are Winning as Emerging-Market Volatility Tumbles – Bloomberg
  • China builds up gold reserves in shift away from dollar – Nikkei Asian Review
  • U.S. Oil Production Is 23 Years Ahead of Schedule – Bloomberg
  • 5 questions with the woman who coined the term ‘gray rhino’ – MarketWatch
  • Can multiple Grey Swans add up to a Black Swan? A brief look at Brexit, tariff wars & more – benefits_pro

Bonus

weekend_chart_1

  • Max Weber’s enduring wisdom – Economist
  • The Three Revolutions Economics Needs, Edmund Phelps – Project Syndicate
  • The Fourth Founding:  The United States and the Liberal Order — Foreign Affairs
  • The risks of a second Brexit referendum must now be run, Martin Wolf – FT
  • Why Europe could be the next trade war for Trump – Sydney Morning Herald
  • A bankruptcy in the Philippines sparks concerns of Chinese firms taking over a former US naval base  – CNBC
  • Tom Brady is a football robot here to take all our playoff records – SB Nation

What are leveraged loans? – FT

Posted in Weekend Reads | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ludicrous

https://twitter.com/lourincapital/status/1088523877955915776?s=12

Mnuchin_Aug15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Smartphones Could Tell All The Food You Buy

Posted in Technology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ownership And Profile Of The Corporate Bond Market

Summary

  • Nonfinancial corporates have amost doubled their stock of outstanding bonds since the GFC moving from 19.5 percent of GDP in 2007 to 26.5 percent in Q3 2018
  • Conversely,  the domestic financial sector has been delevering, reducing bond debt by almost 25 percent since 2007, which reduces systemic risk
  • Foreigners are by far the largest holders of U.S. corporate bonds and, we suspect, the weakest hands

We spent most of the day crunching numbers on the U.S. corporate bond market as stocks went on another roller coaster ride.  Given all the hand-wringing and concern over the buildup of corporate debt since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC), we have a real need to see and understand the data.

The Data

We look at the changes in level, profile, and ownership of the corporate bond market over two different periods with the Fed’s Flow of Funds data.  Our point of reference is Q4 2007, which was not only the end of the early century bull run in stocks and beginning of the GFC but also the quarter where nonfinancial corporate debt as a proportion of the corporate bond market was at its lowest (26.6 percent).

Fast forward 43 quarters to Q3 2018, the latest available data, and lag back 43 quarters from Q4 2007 to Q1 1997, and there you have our three points of measurement.

Conclusions/Data Inferences

1997 Q1 to 2007 Q4

  1. The data illustrate the massive build in leverage in the domestic financial sector from 1997 to 2007, which was the primary cause of the GFC.  Domestic financial sector bond debt grew by 378 percent over the period, increasing at a compounded average growth rate of 15.7 percent, to almost 60 percent of the market.
  2. The stock of nonfinancial corporate bonds grew at a more modest CAGR at 5.5 percent during the same period, right in line with nominal GDP growth.
  3. Foreign issues in the U.S. experienced significant growth though from a small base.
  4. Overall corporate bond debt to GDP grew from 41.08 percent of GDP in 1997 to 73.15 percent by Q3 2018.
  5. Foreign issues should be excluded from the bond debt-to-GDP ratio to gain a better measure of the true debt burden on the U.S. private sector.

2007 Q4 to 2018 Q3

  1. The U.S. domestic financial sector has been deleveraging since the GFC, reflected in the negative 23.7 percent growth rate in the sector’s bonds outstanding.
  2. Conversely, nonfinancial corporates have grown their bond debt by over 90 percent to 42 percent of the corporate bond market and 26.50 percent of GDP, up from 19.47 percent in 2007.
  3. Nonfinancial corporate bonds now make up the most significant percentage of corporate bonds outstanding in the U.S. and, by extension, now the biggest
  4. The diminishing liquidity, or lack of traditional market makers, magnifies the risk of an outsized dislocation in the sector. Though not on such a massive scale,  the buildup in nonfinancial corporate bond debt since 2007 mirrors that of the financial industry from 1997 to 2007.

Who Owns The Corporate Bond Market

  1. Foreign holders of U.S. corporate bonds make up the largest ownership group subjecting the market to capital flight risk, which, in other countries, is often sparked by domestic political instability. Watch this space.
  2. Life insurance companies are the most significant domestic holders of corporate bonds, taking down almost 20 percent of outstandings.
  3. Mutual funds are a close third followed by households, which include hedge funds.
  4. Other makeup over 20 percent of corporate bondholders but each group is less than 5 percent of the market. They include state and local employee pension funds, banks, state and local governments, broker-dealers, ETFs, closed-end funds, among others.
  5. The largest hands – foreign holders – are most likely the weakest hands. Another risk not even close to the radar of most traders and investors.

Upshot

You now have the data and charts, folks.  Short and sweet, easy to read.

Now you have knowledge and can’t claim you were unaware of the risks if the GE refrigerator falls through the kitchen floor.

 

corpbond_5

 

corpbond_1

 

corpbond_3

 

corpbond_8

Data Source

corpbond_table

Help keep the lights on at the Global Macro Monitor.   Contribute any amount based on your perception of our value added by clicking the PayPal donate widget at the right side of the screen.  You don’t need a PayPal account just a credit card.  Thank you!

free rider_2

Posted in Bonds, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Divining POTUS Tweets

The new haruspicy.

What keeps a short seller up at night?  What else?  POTUS tweets!

Is this a signal he is ready to cave on the shutdown?

I look forward to giving a “great” State of the Union Address in the near future.

“Near future?”  The March S&P e-mini?

Great?  Good? Goodbye? Lie?  Buy?  BUY! BUY! BUY! BUY!

This is Kafkaesque, folks!  True Kafka.   Not just for traders but for the Whole Freaking World.

Posted in Politics, President Trump, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

S&P500 Short: Update

Selling 5 contracts at the open of the overnight session.  Back to you with levels.

Update:    Sold 5 March S&P e-minis at 2635.50.  Stop at 2680.00.

Comment: Looks like good news on China deal is pushed out,  less of a tape bomb risk and increasing probability that negotiations could go sideways.  The admin loses cred everytime they trot out Kudlow to goose the market.

The temperature is heating between Trump and the Dems, which we are betting may spook the market.   Could just be posturing ergo be careful of tape bombs in the form an olive branch after tomorrow Senate votes.  Trump has backed himself into a corner a needs a way out as his polls numbers are dropping like a stone.

The Chinese are watching.

Staying flexible.   Nervous there are too many bears roaming the market and some decent chip earnings.  Intel big after close tomorrow.

Didn’t like selling in the hole, down 3 1/2 points below the fair-value close,  but could get some ugly headlines overnight.   Or, maybe not.

Brazil continues to trade well, gold doing nothing, and the British Pound got away from us.

Hope you stayed long, now trading with a 1.31 handle, up over 3.5 percent from the original entry.

Do as we say, not as we do.

trades

Posted in Trades | Tagged | Leave a comment

Getting Short S&P500

Selling 5 contracts at the open of the overnight session.  Back to you with levels.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reskilling The American Workforce

The future is here, folks.

We better start thinking big and bold, beginning with huge investments in human capital.  A new Marshall Plan for the American educational system.

Python is not a difficult coding language to learn and the basics should be mandatory learning by the fourth grade.

wef_3

Help keep the lights on at the Global Macro Monitor.   Contribute any amount based on your perception of our value added by clicking the PayPal donate widget at the right side of the screen.  You don’t need a PayPal account just a credit card.  Thank you!

free rider_2

 

Posted in Employment, Technical Analysis, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

This Day In Financial History – Jan 23

From the Great Jason Zweig

January 23:

1987: Daily trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange exceeds 300 million for the first time, as 302.4 million shares change hands.

Museum of American Financial History; http://www.nyse.com/marketinfo

1932: The Reconstruction Finance Corp. is created under a law signed today by Pres. Herbert Hoover. The RFC, funded with $1.5 billion, lends aggressively to faltering railroads and banks, as well as to municipalities seeking to finance relief programs and public-works projects. But it’s just a drop in the bucket of the Great Depression.

Barrie A. Wigmore, The Crash and Its Aftermath: A History of Securities Markets in the United States, 1929-1933 (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, and London, 1985), p. 311.

Posted in This Day In Financial History, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment