Mrs. Watanabe Can Stand Many Things, But Not Zero Percent

Good piece posted on Bloomberg about how Japanese retail is chasing yield in Turkey.

It’s those 10 percent-plus rates across the Turkish bond curve — among the highest in major emerging markets — that are luring Mr. and Mrs. Watanabe to the country’s assets.

Starved for return by near-zero rates at home, individual investors have propelled a 27 percent jump in Japanese mutual funds’ investments in lira-denominated bonds this year. At 50.8 billion yen ($450 million) through August, it’s poised to be the biggest annual increase since 2012, according to data from Japan’s Investment Trusts Association.  – Bloomberg

Another example that the zeitgeist of the global markets is yield chasing.

As long as there’s a decent economic narrative — the current being “synchronized global economic expansion” — valuations, fundamentals, and event risk take a back seat to the yield seekers.

Surely Ms. Watanable knows about Turkey’s twin deficits and its highest inflation in almost a half decade, not mention the risk of being pulled into Middle East war.   Ten percent can forgive a multitude of sins in today’s NIRP, ZIRP, and one percent world.  Until it doesn’t.

Seeing Japanese retail pile into a market usually was a signal of a top back in the day.

Turkey_Ms Wantabe

Nevertheless, we do not see an end to the yield-seeking zeitgeist until U.S. policy rates hit 3 percent plus (the market thinks never), the Fed balance sheet shrinks at least ten percent, and Euros are ready to roll on QT.   EMs are the place to be in this environment.

A few yuuuge hiccups along the way?  Absolutely.  We are expecting one this month.

Posted in Interest Rates, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Option Value of Cash More Valuable When Scarce

Look at the date of the cash peak and trough.

Not a perfect timing chart, but you know you’re in the zip code.  Unless, of course, this time is different.

It could take more time this time, however.

WSJ_Cash

Posted in Equities, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

COTD: Venezuela Oil Production (t/bpd)

COTD_Venezuela

Ergo (among other things), this:

COTD_Venezuela_1

There is some minimum threshold level of reserves most central banks will not cross and will resort to various policies to protect and ration foreign exchange reserves, including devaluation, import restrictions, capital controls, selective default, and a full-blown debt moratorium.

Venezuela has used most of these except the latter.   That may be tested in the next five weeks as the country has $3.5 billion of debt payments coming due, mainly by the state-owned oil company known as PDVSA.

The country has been very crafty finding ways keeping PDVSA from defaulting  by rationing reserves, selective defaults to suppliers and other creditors, and finding foreign sponsors, such as China and Russia.

The next few months may be the breaking point for the country, however, especially after U.S. sanctions really begin to bite.

COTD_Venezuela_3

(COTD:  Chart of the Day)

Posted in Credit, Crude Oil, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Third Quarter Review – September 29

Global Stock Indices

Global stock markets performed well in the Q3, especially the emerging markets.  Capital is flying into the sector.  Argentina looked unstoppable up almost 20 percent in the quarter with another 4 percent increase last week, and now up over 50 percent on the year.   Guess this is the time to start selling at least for trade to reload lower.

Greece down on profit taking and IMF noise.

 

Quarterly_Stocks

Global 10-year Bond Yields

Yield chasers continued to commit capital to the high-yielding emerging markets such as Brazil and Indonesia.  Portugal came in big on recapturing of its investment grade rating.

Global bond yields on the rise in the past few weeks.  We are expecting a taper tantrum in Europe and a significant rise in European yields this month.   That trade is dependent on how the situation in Spain unfolds.

Quarterly_Bonds

Global Currencies

The Argentina peso was the weakest currency for the quarter and, in part, explains the country’s big equity gains.  China showed strength but was weaker for the month of September.  The dollar index was down almost 3 percent but looks like it has put in a bottom and has been stronger the past few weeks.   Catalonia should give the dollar a further boost.

Quarterly_Currencies

Select Commodities

Zinc up big in Q3 and after a few weeks of selling ended the month strong. Crude trading better based on the perception than demand is growing and the OPEC and U.S shale obsession seems to have waned for the moment. Grains continue to trade poorly.

Quarterly_Commodities

Other Risk Indicators

U.S. semiconductors rocked the free world in the Q3 along with the rest of the tech sector.  The Stress Index came off the lows but remains below zero, which constitutes normal financial conditions. A negative number connotes very favorable financial conditions. The index has been declining (favorable) over the past few weeks, however.

Quarterly_Other

On The Radar

We are expecting a sharp trap door sell-off in the risk markets in October triggered by a myriad of potential events, including a bond market temper tantrum in Europe,  a China economic or political shock coming out of the 19th Party Congress beginning on the 18th,  severely overbought markets, geopolitical shocks, and others.

We are watching the fallout from the Catalonia vote, politics in China, progress on the Trump tax reform deal,  the continued sell-off in global bond markets.   Looking for emerging markets to cool off, which are way overbought.

 

Key Charts

Quarterly_Charts_1

.

Quarterly_Charts_2

.

Quarterly_Charts_3.png

.

Quarterly_Charts_6

.

Quarterly_Charts_5

.

Quarterly_Charts_4

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Sector ETF Performance – September 29

SectorETF_DaySectorETF_WeekSectorETF_MonthSectorETF_QSectorETF_YTD

Posted in Sector ETF Peformance, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

GMM At The Movies: Darkest Hour

This looks sooooo good.   Coming to a theatre near you on November 22.

“You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth” – “Winnie” – FDR’s nickname for Winston Churchill

.

Churchill was a fan of a drink, in particular Champagne. He said of it: “I could not live without Champagne. In victory I deserve it. In defeat I need it.” – Express

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Global Risk Monitor – September 29

RiskMon_1

.

RiskMon_2

Posted in Daily Risk Monitor, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

What’s The Matter With Inflation?

What’s The Matter Kansas  inflation?

The divergence of official inflation as measured by the government versus inflation realized by the consumer and businesses has never been greater, in our opinion.   Go ask anybody on the street in America and Europe if they think “doing life or business”  is getting  more expensive. 

We have some thoughts on what is the matter with the inflation data:

  1. Defining inflation – what is your definition of inflation?  What are we trying to measure?  The prices in a  consumer basket of goods and services?   Wages?  Asset prices?
  2. Measurement problems – the official measurement procedures seem archaic given the advent of big data in the past few years.   Even Bloomberg is out with a recent piece warning the Fed about low-balling inflation due to measurement errors.

    Low-Balling Inflation Puts the Fed at Risk

    Beware of any metric that doesn’t fully reflect housing prices.

    The U.S. has an inflation problem. It has nothing to do with inflation being too high or too low. Unlike the raging inflation of the 1970s, it doesn’t need to be solved with a lengthy and painful recession. Instead, it is a problem of measurement because the cost of housing — the single biggest expense for many Americans — isn’t explicitly included in the inflation data. 

    …Recent research from the Bank for International Settlements finds that the transmission mechanism for monetary policy has shifted. In their paper “Monetary Policy Transmission and Trade-Offs in the United States: Old and New,” Boris Hofmann and Gert Peersman concluded that changes in monetary policy — rate hikes or rate cuts — are being filtered into the economy increasingly through housing prices and less so via businesses raising prices as in years past. So even though the Federal Reserve’s policies are causing those prices to rise, they aren’t registering in the form of higher overall inflation.

    ..This creates a troublesome landscape for executing monetary policy. The Fed is wedded to a 2 percent annual inflation target without being able to get a reliable read on whether it is accomplishing that goal.
    – Bloomberg, September 28

  3. Shrinkflation – companies are finding ways to raise prices without raising prices.  Paying the same price for, say, a bag of M&Ms with now only 20 candies compared to last year’s 32 candies is inflation in price per unit.   This should be adjusted for in the government stats, but we doubt they capture all of it.  Even if they try, it is unlikely they can keep up with the reality of the gazillion prices in just the domestic the economy.           Inflation_2
  4. Over massaging the data – hedonic price adjustments by the BLS is total B.S..  The government economists make quality adjustments to prices.   Alan Greenspan used to use the analogy of eye surgery when explaining hedonics.   Let us paraphrase Greenie to make our point:   Historically,  eye surgery would cost you $100 in current dollars but was done with a hacksaw.  Today, eye surgery is done with laser technology and costs $10,000.  Adjusting for the quality of today’s surgery, the price has not increased.   Seasonal adjustments?   We would love to buy at some of those seasonally adjusted prices.  We call bullshit.

We could go on and on and on about the many problems with how inflation is defined and measured.

In The Government’s Interest To Keep Inflation Data Low

Keep it in perspective, comrades, the government has an interest in keeping the inflation data low.   The U.S. policymakers changed how housing is calculated in the CPI after the big inflation of the 1970’s.  Remember,  social security payments have cost of living adjustments (COLAs) linked to inflation.   Imagine if inflation breaks out with all the boomers joining the SS ranks?  Big problem.

The government’s interest in keeping inflation low is even greater now given the high debt load that most developed countries are carrying.

Nasty Feedback Loop If “Inflation” Picks Up

Ponder the ugly feedback loop:  “Inflation”  increases, interest rates rise, which increases interest payments on the Yuuge national debt.   The larger budget deficit alone is inflationary, but, in the future it is likely to be monetized.   This will accelerate inflation as inflationary expectations increase.   Nasty spiral.

Monetary policymakers know the downside of a ugly debt deflation and makes them understandably cautious about raising interest rates even though they are sowing the seeds of the deflation they fear most as they blow more and more asset bubbles, which all will inevitably burst.   Coming out of the Great Recession they suffer from “recency bias.”

It seems we now live in a type of Hegelian dialectic progression of deflation/inflation with the synthesis being asset bubbles, which immediately sow the seeds for another round of deflation/inflation.   Comrades!

Furthermore,  real wages decline if real-world prices are rising regardless of how inflation is being measured,  correctly or incorrectly.   It may explain, in part,  the punk economic recovery and the rise of populism.   That is real wages are lower than what is currently measured.

Fake News

So, when we see headline inflation defined as low, or the words lowflation, we think, and hate to say it, “Fake News!”

The markets should see through the inflation data but don’t care as they are having too much fun making money.

Euroflation

Nevertheless,  our friends at Focus Economics are out with a great infographic on inflation in the ‘zone, which we thought you should see.

 

Inflation_1.png

 

 

Posted in Inflation/Deflation, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 25 Comments

COTD: President Trump’s Proposed Tax Reform

Individual income tax makes up around 49 percent of the Unites States tax revenue, the single biggest position, according to inside.gov. Trump wants to simplify the tax code by bringing the number of income tax rates from now seven down to three (35, 25, 12 percent). The plan didn’t name specific income thresholds, but the New York Times consulted plans by the House Republicans from 2016 to see how the new brackets could shape up.

Some observers have argued that Trump’s tax plan would one-sidedly profit the rich. Indeed, bringing down the tax ceiling from almost 40 to 35 percent would profit the biggest earners. In the lower middle income bracket ($37,950 to $91,900) there wouldn’t be any movement (25 percent). This contradicts Trump’s assertion that he would aim for tax cuts for the middle class. Finally, lowest income bracket taxes would hike 2 percentage points.  – statista

Tax Reform_Statista

Posted in Budget Deficit, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Corporate Tax Rates and Tax Receipts

Here are some interesting data on the U.S. corporate tax rate throughout the last hundred years and a chart of federal tax receipts on corporate income as a percent of GDP.  We gathered the data from the Tax Policy Center and FRED.

Key Observations:

On Rates:

  • The corporate tax rate usually quoted is for the top bracket;
  • The corporate tax rate began to climb rapidly in 1940;
  • President Truman raised the rate from 38 % to 52 % from 1949 to 1952;
  • The tax rate peaked under Johnson/Nixon at 52.8 %;
  • President Reagan did not cut the corporate tax rate until the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1395 pages) phasing it in over two years, reducing it from 46 % to 34 % in 1988.
  • During President Clinton’s first year in office, 1993, the corporate rate was raised to 35 percent where it has remained until today.
  • President Trump’s plan to reduce the rate to 20 percent puts it back to where it hasn’t been since 1939.

Federal Corporate Tax Receipts:

  • Corporate tax receipts peaked in 1942 at 7.52 % of GDP with a rate of 40 %;
  • Corporate tax receipts bottomed after the dot.com bust in 2002 at 1.38 % of GDP;
  • It appears that corporate tax receipts experienced a structural change in the early 1980’s and have been in the 40-year range between 1.38 % and 2.88 % irrespective of the corporate tax rate and more economically dependent. We suspect it is globalization.

We have also added a couple charts of the highest corporate tax rate countries and the lowest coming to us via the Tax Foundation.   They note the U.S. effective corporate tax rate is among the highest in the world,

The United States has the fourth highest statutory corporate income tax rate among the 202 jurisdictions surveyed. The U.S. rate of 38.91 percent (comprised of the federal statutory rate of 35 percent plus an average of the corporate income taxes levied by individual states) ranks only behind the United Arab Emirates (55 percent),Comoros (50 percent), and Puerto Rico (39 percent). Comparatively, the average tax rate of the 202 jurisdictions surveyed is 22.96 percent, or 29.41 percent weighted by GDP.  –  Tax Foundation

Corporate Taxes_Table

Corporate Taxes_Chart

Corporate Taxes_Highest

Corporate Taxes_L

Posted in Fiscal Policy | Tagged , | Leave a comment