Discipline Trumps Conviction

Today’s close above 3125 takes us out of our short position, which we started scaling into at 3025.  We are still fairly confident that this market can be bought at much lower prices at some point in the next 18 months.   We hate getting squeezed out up here, which is probably a sign of the top and it won’t be the first time.

We’re going to the beach and patiently waiting with our long-term money and we will be on alert to the downside when the fever and market breaks.   Maybe the MoMo takes the S&P up another 1-2 percent but we don’t know, nor does anyone else, and we have limited pain tolerance.

S&P500 Returns

The S&P500 closed today, up exactly 25 percent on the year.   An up year after the ugly Q4 2018 crash and a subsequent strong first-quarter bounce is no surprise, folks.

There has not been one year since 1950, not one, where the S&P has increased by more than 10 percent in Q1, after experiencing a negative prior year, which didn’t close the year up less than 20 percent.  It’s Newton’s Q1 Law of S&P Momentum.   – GMM,  April  1, 2019

S&P_Q1

By the way,  the data in the above table illustrate how we calculated 3025 as the beginning of the selling zone.  It was our extrapolation of the average return for years with similar short-term histories.   Our trade worked out twice this year before the latest ramp.

The above data also show that this year’s strength is a mirror image of the extreme weakness in Q4 2018 but look at the yield curve at the end of Q1 versus the other years.

If the market closes here for the year, it would be the 13th best annual price move for the S&P since 1950.  Another 60 S&P points higher by year-end would move it into 6th or 7th place.

Really?   Does the economy and earnings justify these gains?

Yield Curve

The yield curve is almost meaningless in a world where central banks own half of the U.S. Treasury coupon curve though their positions in bills are very light historically.  At the end of 2007, for example, before the Fed moved from an OMO to a QE monetary policy, the U.S. and foreign central banks held 44.05 percent of outstanding T-bills versus just 12.64 percent at the end of September.  This, of course, distinguishes between repos and asset purchases on the Fed’s balance sheet.

We suspect this is a major reason for the cash crunch in the money markets.   More in later post.

Why Is The Market Rising?

It is for silly reasons that the market is rising or, should we say, the prevailing narrative of why it is moving higher.

Expectations of some sort of faux-China trade deal, which we get — any cessation of economic hostilities between the two world superpowers is a good thing but the market has rallied quite a bit already.   There will be no resolution to the economic competition and long-term conflict between Chimerica, which has been the main driver of corporate earnings and global growth for the past 25 years.  The world economy will be much weaker than when the trade war began with no resolution in sight, and we don’t think a “Phase 1” deal is going to move the real economic needle much.

Furthermore,  the Fed’s massive repo intervention (SOMA portfolio has not grown much) to stabilize the money markets is not exactly positive in our book.  It is a signal the monetary distortions and huge debt issuance over the past decade are beginning to come home to roost.

Nevertheless, the markets can remain irrational longer than we can remain solvent.

The market strength has been more of a technical matter, in our opinion.  Lack of supply as corporates have taken out massive stock with buybacks, the move to passive investing, and the greed & fear of FOMO.

Sustainable Levels   

This market needs some very accelerated global economic growth to sustain these levels. Growth is difficult in such a highly indebted world, however, as interest rates can’t move higher to their equilibrium levels.  The large stock of debt is going to act as a governor on growth as a break out in market rates will break the market and break the economy.   And that, folks, is why the central banks are in their current feeding frenzy.

What will be the big negative shock that shakes the tree loose?   Your guess is as good as ours but it shall come.

Cut Quick And Keep Losses Small

Our total loss in the short position is a little over 2.3 percent.  Keeping losses small allows you to fight another day.  We know it’s pretty tight stop but that’s the downside of playing with leverage.

Moreover, we are more comfortable to be flattish and missing another, say, one or two percent but will continue to move our target sale prices higher and wait for the market to break.

As my first trading boss on Wall Street used to preach to me almost daily, ” I don’t like being long when the fundamentals are not supportive.  The bottom can drop out of the market.”

Hear ya’, boss.

On to the next trade and, now, it over the woods and through the snow and to Grandmother’s house, we go.

Have a great Thanksgiving, folks.

S&P500

Posted in Economics, S&P500, Uncategorized | Tagged | 5 Comments

China Trade Talks And Presidential Stengelese

All right everyone, line up alphabetically according to your height. – Casey Stengel 

Posted in Trade War | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Party Like It’s 1999

Geez…all roads seem to lead to skewed distributions, be it: 1) household wealth ;  2) excess reserves held by a few large SIFI banks, and, 3) stock market returns (narrow breadth).   Not healthy.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is Real Populism On The Way?

The new cover of Time thinks so.

Time

Real populism is usually rooted in left-wing economic policies of soaking the rich, import-substitution trade policies and zero concern of protecting the wealth of the elites, which is mostly held in the financial genre of public and private equity (around 60 percent).

Asset_Allocation_By_Percentile Group

In 2016, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) had 5,000 members; since then, its dues-paying membership has multiplied more than tenfold. This new energy on the left terrifies chief executives and billionaires, and yet many of them have been voicing similar alarms about a crisis of capitalism. Ray Dalio, the billionaire co-chairman of the investment firm Bridgewater Associates, warned in April that America faced a “national emergency” in capitalism’s failure to benefit more people, and he pronounced the American Dream lost. The anti-capitalist impulse has some purchase on the right too. Before he pushed a tax cut that lined the capitalists’ pockets, Donald Trump ran, most improbably, as a Republican skeptical of the financial elite’s loyalty to Americans. On Fox News, Tucker Carlson has entertained a surprising skepticism of capitalist doctrines and said positive things about Warren. – Time

Trump’s populism is one that cuts taxes for the rich, make cosmetic tweaks to trade deals as not to upset the markets, and leans heavily on the Fed to lower interest rates to keep the stock market inflated.   In other words, a Trojan Horse for the 1 percenters but he puts on one helluva great circus to entertain the base.

Not absolutely sure if it’s going to be 2020 — the predictions markets have cut Elizabeth Warren’s chances of winning the nomination in half in the last month — but maybe a pop lighter version until the demographics are stronger, but it is coming, folks.  You can bank on a People’s QE.

 

YouGov.png

 

Long pitchforks.  Long inflation.

Posted in Populism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ronald Reagan Must Be Rolling Over In His Grave

There are facts, as established and documented in the Mueller Report, and there are conspiracies, created and propagated by the Russian GRU and Vladimir Putin, and held by the President of the United States and his followers.

The Russia expert [Dr. Fiona Hill] commandeered the national spotlight to tell the conspiracy-minded members on the committee — she didn’t use the word Republican and she didn’t have to — to stop peddling that Ukraine, not Russia, was interfering in the 2016 election.

To do so is to advance “a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.” — Chicago Sun-Times

Ronald Reagan, in his worst nightmares, would have never believed his own party could or would ever carry the Russian government’s water and be spreading their propaganda. Bad Moon Rising.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

This “Chinese Hoax” Is Already Getting Old But Just Beginning

Our power is going to be shut off again.  That’s three times in the past two months!

The Chickens Are Finally Coming Home To Roost

We suspect this is the first pitch in the top of the first inning in a long-game of survival of the human species.   Trump is correct in the above tweet: the concept of global warming is making us very non-competitive.

Unlike the politicos who run the U.S. government, however, we are believers in science —- preponderance of evidence over beyond a reasonable doubt —  and evolution, so we agree with the assessment of the vast majority of scientists and hoping some technology disrupters come along and save the planet.  They are and will be, battling some very powerful interests, however.

Fix The F%*king Grid, Please!

While we’re at it, let’s fix the friggin’ grid

If the utilities, such as PG&E, would have spent more on CapX than buying back stock and paying dividends, and used a larger portion of their cash flow for CapX to modernize the grid’s infrastructure, the lights might be on tomorrow.   They should start, by burying the live wires underground.

Maybe if Trump Towers New York is underwater in five years, the ex-POTUS and his free-basers may then become believers.   Nah, it’s in the bible,

He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’  – Book of Luke

 

PG&E

ISIS Is Coming

By the way, we hear quiet whispers and sense a small bit of concern after ISIS issued their Flames Of War poster a few weeks ago, encouraging their disciples to ignite wildfires across the U.S. and Europe.

ISIS_1

As wind-whipped wildfires char parts of California, ISIS supporters distributed a propaganda poster showing a flaming street in San Francisco accompanied by one of their fire-themed slogans.

With the headline “Flames of War,” the photoshopped image depicts the 400 block of Geary Street, with an ISIS flag perched above the vertical sign for the Touchstone Hotel. Two heavily armed jihadists stand in the middle of the street, alight with embers in addition to the buildings on the block.

The image was circulated online last week at about the same time as the beginning of the Kincade Fire north of San Francisco in Sonoma County, which may have been sparked by power lines during intense winds.  –  homelandsecuritytoday, Oct 29th

That’s all we need, more National Enquirer-esque conspiracy hysteria.  God forbid another big fire breaks out in California during the next week.

Fear Of Wildfires and Japanese Internment During World War II 

Fears of wildfire sabotage are nothing new to America.

It is a little known fact, at least in the group we hang with, that one of President Franklin Roosevelt’s main justifications of interning Japanese Americans in the West during World War II was the fear of wildfire sabotage.

Hysteria swept the country after Pearl Harbor, and especially after the Japanese bombed the town of Goleta, California — that’s UC Santa Barbara, folks — from a submarine in the Pacific, taking out a small oil field and setting fire to a local orange grove.  This convinced Roosevelt to make the shameful move that would stain his legacy forever.

We must guard against Japanese incendiary bombs and incendiary fires during the dry season,” FDR wrote the head of the Bureau of Budget. “This is essential for our national future.”

…Roosevelt decided that the Japanese-American roundup was necessary to save U.S. timber reserves. He then took to the airwaves asking Americans to patrol forests and report potential sabotage

“Uncontrolled fire, even in normal times, is a national menace,” he proclaimed. “Today … when agents of our enemies are seeking to hinder us by every possible means, it is essential that destructive fire be brought under stricter control in order that victory may be achieved at the earliest date.”  — Douglas Brinkley, CNN

There you have it, folks, a little history, which is becoming increasingly relevant for all the wrong reasons.

See you when the lights come back on.

Posted in Climate Change, Economics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Trade And Tariff Hysteresis

Hysteresis in the field of economics refers to an event in the economy that persists into the future, even after the factors that led to that event have been removed. – Investopedia

I first heard the term hysteresis applied to trade and explained by a young Paul Krugman at a World Bank luncheon years ago.  Though he was using the exchange rate as the exerting force on import and export markets, he explained it in simple terms,

If you put enough pressure on a spoon by bending it for a long enough period of time, it will never return to its original position. So to it is with export and import markets.  – Paul Krugman, paraphrased 

The simpletons think if tariffs are only just paused, or if some are even rolled backed, we are going back to the “good ol’ daze.”  Yeah, right.

Pity our poor farmers, who are caught up in this mess.

Running Out Of Free Lunches

We are almost out of free lunches, folks, and will be posting only sporadically unless your support increases.   Donate whatever you think is fair by clicking on the PayPal button just below the Twitter and search icons on the upper right-hand side of the blog.  You do not need a PayPal account and can use almost any credit card.

Don’t be a free rider.  Thanks, so much.

free rider

Posted in Trade War | Tagged | 3 Comments

World Growth Projections – IMF

In case you missed the IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) growth projections,  here you have it.  Forecasts are a guide, not a constitution.

World Growth Projections

World Growth Projections_2

 

Posted in Economics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

COTD: Recession Triggers

COTD = Chart of the Day

Nice chart from Mark Zandi from Moody’s Analytics.

Recession Triggers

Posted in Economics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Welcome To The Forever Trade War

Are you surprised?  We’re not (see our repost below).

Now markets will have to grapple with does Trump carry through with the December tariffs? If not, he looks weak, weak, weak. If so, the stock market is going to get weak, weak, weak.

Thus, President Trump is faced with the choice of protecting the elite 10%, who own 80 plus percent of all stocks or playing Mr. Tough Guy on China to placate his base.

As the Phase One of his physical examination was completed this past Saturday,  a Phase One Trade Deal can’t be ruled out, but it is gonna need a big ginormous shovel.

Repost

China Still Looking For A Rollback

We posted our,  Roll back: The Verb China Is Looking For,  two months ago and China is still looking for a rollback on some of the tariffs that have already been implemented.

We wondered out loud if President Trump is about to cave and cut another meaningless trade deal — Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 7, whatever  — which has already caused enormous pain with almost no gain,

So, after all the American economic carnage caused by Trump’s trade war, is the administration about to, or willing to cave on what they said were the most important issues:  1) intellectual property protection, 2) industrial policy reform?

Will Trump cut another meaningless Potemkin Trade Deal?

Markets salivate at the prospect of the end of trade conflict no matter who is the perceived winner.  However,  from a game-theoretic perspective, it is hard to imagine President Trump caving on tariffs unless the Chinese make major concessions on some of the structural issues, such as economic restructuring, lest he looks weak going into the 2020 election.

President Trump is not a rational actor, has no strategy,  and his negotiating team is divided, in our opinion, so who knows what will happen.  It’s clear to us, President Xi has the upper hand and the administration is grappling behind the scenes.

It is widely expected that, as part of a phase one deal, the U.S. and China will roll back part of the tariffs levied during the year-long trade dispute. 

But Peter Navarro, assistant to the president and director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, argued forcefully against and even shook his head no at the suggestion of tariff relief in an interview with Yahoo Finance’s The Final Round on Friday, casting a shadow over the much-anticipated deal signing. 

“There’s no rollback at all,” Navarro said. “So we need the tariffs there, but the tariffs are really our best insurance policy as well to make sure that the Chinese are negotiating in good faith.”  – Yahoo Finance

China says no deal without a rollback.  Peter Navarro says no rollback.  It sounds like we are at Walmart.

We may or may not know more as President Trump delivers his speech at the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday.

Must View

By the way,  we highly recommend you watch the latest Frontline documentary (here) about the global struggle for AI supremacy to gain some perspective on what is really going on underneath the surface of these trade negotiations.

Roll back: The Verb China Is Looking For

Roll back is the verb China is looking for.

Mr. Market is all lathered up this morning on the following report,

ChinaTrade_Ag_2

Source: @FerroTV

Not so fast.

ChinaTrade_Ag_3

A senior White House official said the U.S. is “absolutely not” considering an interim trade deal with China.

Bloomberg News reported earlier Thursday the Trump administration discussed putting together a limited trade deal that would delay and remove some China tariffs, citing five people familiar with the matter. The news had driven stocks to session highs. — CNBC

Major Cave 

From our cheap seats in the peanut gallery, we can’t help but notice for the past month the Chinese have been sending signals and tossing the Trump negotiating team a few bones to walk back the new tariffs that went into effect on September 1st with more to come.   No bite from Trump as the September 1st tariffs went live.  Ditto for China’s retaliatory tariffs.

Then we heard China is willing to buy American ag products to jump-start negotiations.

ChinaTrade_Ag

The source said China could also offer more market access, better protection for intellectual property and to cut excess industrial capacity, but would be more reluctant to compromise on subsidies, industrial policy and reform of state-owned enterprises.  – SCMP

 

That would be short-term positive for the farmers but, come on, man,  central planning in trade?  Remove the price distortions and let the market forces rip and do their thing.

We also wonder if Trump’s negotiators understand the concept of hysteresis,

Hysteresis in the field of economics refers to an event in the economy that persists into the future, even after the factors that led to that event have been removed.  – Investopedia

Even if tariffs are completely rolled back, it may take a long time for U.S. farmers to restore their export markets, if ever.

Deal Or No Deal?

So, after all the American economic carnage caused by Trump’s trade war, is the administration about to, or willing to cave on what they said were the most important issues:  1) intellectual property protection, 2) industrial policy reform?

Will Trump cut another meaningless Potemkin Trade Deal?

We don’t know.  These clowns are so unstable and divided, losing the support of the American electorate, and seem to be in panic mode as Trump’s polling numbers continue to drop like the Hard Rock Cafe in Atlantic City!

The polls du jour show President Donald Trump trailing basically every Democrat in the 2020 general election, both nationally and in individual states — even in Texas.

…Their [polls] message is pretty simple: Trump looks weak. The president is lagging in the low 40s in head-to-head polls, consistent with his stubbornly low approval ratings. A lot of Americans seem to be fully committed to or are actively considering voting for somebody else. That’s not where the incumbent, after three years in office, should be if they want a second term. – Vox, Sep 12th

China Will Never Cave On The Big Issues

We are fairly certain Trump will never force the Chinese to speak English as their primary language…err…change the structure of their economy.

A Potemkin trade deal?

It is looking more likely but a big political risk for President Trump as his right flank will begin to turn on him as looking weak.   The left will bring out massive firepower and label the deal a “No gainer, but massive pain.”

Deals Galore? 

We also wonder if the Administration is on the verge of a “deals galore” flurry with, say, China, North Korea, Iran, and the Taliban (“the Fab Four”) before the election?  We are perplexed by, and the way John Bolton exited the White House yesterday,

And as impulsive and unpredictable as the president’s actions may be, firing Mr. Bolton reveals a certain consistency in Mr. Trump’s worldview: Though attracted to never-been-done theatrics like bringing the Taliban to Camp David or meeting with Mr. Kim, the president is also moored by suspicion of military adventures and has a huge appetite for deals.

What Mr. Trump really wants from his foreign policy is a diplomatic victory as he heads into his 2020 re-election campaign. — NY Times, Sept 10th

Why do we have that sinking feeling the “Fab Four” are licking their chops and looking at each other, thinking

Time to feast! 

Place your bets, folks.

P.S…. We have given up on any short-term calls on the market as it already difficult enough fighting against the algos and trading ‘bots, much less the central planners who now manipulate the markets almost hourly with their twitter accounts and the dropping of tape bombs.  Pretty fracking disgusting.

SEC where the f&*k are you?   That’s right, we forget, a sitting president cannot be indicted.

Nevertheless, we are sellers at 3025-3100 on the S&P and feel pretty confident the market can be bought at much lower prices sometime during the next 18 months.  We do reserve the right to be wrong and to remain solvent, thus our stop at 3125.

Posted in China, Trade War, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment