QOTD: The Fog & Confusion of a Trade War

QOTD: Quote of the Day

What does this administration exactly want? Do they want a new trade deal? Do they want tariffs? We just don’t know,” – Eelco Heinen, finance minister of the Netherlands.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Viva Free Trade: How Tariffs Make Us Poorer

Great video, must view.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

HOTD: Not So Fast

HOTD = Headline of the Day

Click here to view the SCMP article. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Are Trade Deficits Bad?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Anatomy of a Bond and Currency Crisis

It was the autumn of 1996 when I arrived in Sofia, Bulgaria.  I was working for a major Wall Street investment bank and had a clear and urgent mission to assess the sustainability of Bulgaria’s sovereign debt. The atmosphere in the capital was tense; the economic and political uncertainty hung thick in the air. The government was hanging by a thread while struggling to roll over its maturing Treasury bills.  The early signs of a major burst of inflation were no longer subtle, as confidence in the Bulgarian currency was rapidly diminishing. In a series of high-level meetings with senior officials, one stood out: a particularly strained and revealing encounter at the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB), where the full scale of the crisis came into sharp focus.

Central Banker Confession
What I remember most vividly was sitting across from a senior BNB official. When I asked how the government would roll over its large tranches of domestic Treasury bills coming due, he looked me in the eye and said, “Gregor, we will not let the government default.”

Hyperinflation
It was less reassurance than a veiled admission—the central bank would monetize all the debt coming due if need be.  At that moment, I knew a currency collapse and hyperinflation were imminent.   As soon as I stepped out of the central bank, I called our trading and sales desk in New York to warn that the lev was about to collapse and hyperinflation was coming. 

Indeed, within months, monthly inflation hit 242%, and the lev was virtually worthless, losing 90 percent of its value before the country was forced to implement a currency board.   I remember buying a bottle of good wine for the equivalent of 27 U.S. cents. During a hyperinflationary spiral, the exchange rate moves first, and domestic prices follow.  

Bad Economic Policy
Bulgaria’s crisis was the product of delayed reforms, systemic banking fragility, and most importantly, a collapse of market confidence. After the fall of communism, its banking sector remained riddled with non-performing loans and politically motivated credit issuance. When the government failed to roll over its domestic debt, the central bank was forced to buy unsold Treasury bills, initiating a fatal inflationary spiral. By late 1996, the BNB had monetized nearly the entire public domestic debt, with inflation exploding and currency substitution rampant. There was no functmioning bond market—no buyer of last resort except the printing press.

U.S. Economic Policy
In contrast, during the COVID-19 crisis, the U.S. Federal Reserve engaged in massive Treasury purchases, effectively monetizing the new debt.  In the table below, we illustrate how the U.S. government issued almost $5 trillion of new debt to finance the massive COVID deficits.  The markets could not absorb such a large new issuance, and the Fed stepped in and took down 91 percent of all net new debt — not through the auctions but indirectly from primary dealers — including 84 percent of all coupon securities and much of the incremental increase in T-bills.   

This move, however, did not trigger hyperinflation. Why? Because global confidence in the U.S. dollar remains deeply entrenched. As Ray Dalio, Barry Eichengreen, and other economists note, the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency allows the U.S. to borrow cheaply despite a public debt exceeding 120% of GDP

Fading Confidence
But that privilege appears to be eroding. Recent headlines reveal a sharp sell-off in the dollar, rising Treasury yields, and spiking gold prices not from inflation fears alone, but from doubts and lack of credibility in the U.S. government itself

If a similar crisis were to hit today,  given current market conditions, particularly the falling confidence in U.S. assets, it is questionable whether the Fed could act so aggressively. 

The “exorbitant privilege” is now in question​. Foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries, possibly China and Japan, appear to be quietly trimming their U.S. debt exposure. The traditional “flight to safety” into Treasuries during crises is faltering. Even safe-haven capital is drifting elsewhere—into German bunds, gold, the Japanese yen, and the Swissie.

Heed the Lesson
Bulgaria’s crisis teaches a painful lesson: when confidence is lost, governments can’t borrow, and central banks must print. That’s not theoretical—it happened. It happened in many of the countries that I worked with, including Argentina, Venezuela, Poland, and Brazil. And while the U.S. is a world apart in size and economic complexity, the fundamental rules of finance still apply. If global investors lose faith in the dollar the way they lose faith in an emerging market, the U.S. will face higher borrowing costs, capital flight, and weakened policy flexibility.

The Congressional Budget Office now warns of “significant fiscal risk” if current debt trends continue. Tariff wars, political instability, and threats to Federal Reserve independence all compound this risk. The next crisis may not grant the U.S. the luxury of borrowing its way out. If that confidence evaporates, we will be staring into the mirror of Bulgaria’s past.

Confidence is Fragile
I’ll leave you with a fitting quote from the GOAT of NFL quarterbacks, Joe Montana:

“Confidence is a very fragile thing.”

Let’s hope the President takes that to heart—and soon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

QOTD: “Ejectoral” College Is Voting

QOTD = Quote of the Day

A currency is only as good as the government that backs it. – Economist 

Chart Source: Barchart.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Amazon’s China Exposure

As the single largest player in the ecommerce industry, Amazon generates between 10% and 15% of global online sales. In its home market, the US ecommerce giant makes up to 40% of total ecommerce sales and generates the highest revenue in three out of four major product categories, outperforming competitors by a large margin. But ironically, while Amazon is seen as emblematic of American success in ecommerce, Chinese products are the backbone of its marketplace.

According to data presented by AltIndex.com, more than 70% of all products sold on Amazon are made in China…

Statistics show that 71% of the products that wholesalers and retailers sell on Amazon are produced in China, or 2.4 times more than in the United States, illustrating China’s importance for Amazon’s business. US products have a much smaller share and account for 30% of all total goods sold through the US e-commerce giant, while India stands in third place with a 14% share. – AltIndex

Screenshot
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

POTD: Tariff Rhymes

POTD = Picture of the Day

Source: FT

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global Risk Monitor: Weekly Update – April 18

Happy Easter, folks!

The Trump administration’s tariff strategy continues to function less as a deliberate trade policy and more as a volatile, reactionary experiment. Markets are grappling with a growing realization: there is no unified objective anchoring current U.S. trade actions. Is the administration trying to reshore manufacturing? Raise revenues? Or promote freer and fairer trade? All three goals conflict—and the markets know it. The result has been a weakening dollar, rising gold prices, and diverging capital flows.

This week’s 3% rally in gold, alongside the sixth decline in seven weeks for the U.S. dollar, underscores a broader erosion of investor confidence in the U.S. policy framework. While U.S. bond yields stabilized and credit spreads modestly contracted, the underlying message remains clear: investors are hedging against deeper policy missteps. Until the administration resolves its own internal contradictions, volatility is likely to persist, and global capital will remain in search of clarity elsewhere.

The administration’s approach has produced a confusing cycle: new tariffs imposed, then partially reversed under pressure; sector-specific exemptions offered one week, then threatened again the next. The pause on semiconductor and electronics tariffs has done little to reassure investors given the lack of a consistent framework. Meanwhile, tariff-driven inflation threatens to stall growth just as the Fed tries to preserve monetary flexibility.

Market pressures may eventually force a strategic retreat. But until then, the White House appears more responsive to market headlines than to long-term macroeconomic outcomes. The central lesson of this week: instability is becoming structural.

 

Markets

U.S. Market Analysis

  • Major indexes mixed: S&P 500 –1.5%, Dow –2.6%, Nasdaq –2.6%, Russell 2000 +1.1%.
  • Sector rotation: Non-energy minerals and utilities outperformed; tech and consumer durables lagged.
  • Gold surges: +2.8% % for the week, now up 26.7% YTD as investors seek protection from U.S. policy risk.
  • Dollar decline accelerates: USD hits a three-year low, now down 8.5% YTD.
  • Bond market stable: Yields declined across maturities. 10Y Treasury at 4.33%, credit spreads modestly narrower.

Global Market Analysis

  • Europe: STOXX 600 +3.9%. ECB cuts deposit rate to 2.25%, signals more easing. Italy +5.74%, Germany +4.08%.
  • Asia:
    • Japan: Nikkei +3.4%, cautious BoJ; yen strengthens amid trade tension.
    • China: Shanghai +1.19%; Q1 GDP +5.4%, but driven by pre-tariff demand. Stimulus expected.
  • Emerging Markets: Risk-off sentiment persists, but no major capital dislocations yet.

Economics

U.S. Economic Overview

  • Retail sales jump 1.4%, possibly boosted by pre-tariff buying.
  • Fed holds line: Powell warns tariffs will raise inflation and lower growth. June rate cut still base case.
  • Housing deteriorates: Housing starts –11.4% in March; builder confidence remains weak.
  • Dollar weakness raises inflation risk, complicating Fed strategy.

Global Economic Overview

  • ECB turns dovish: Rate cut to 2.25%, signals 2.0% likely by June.
  • BoJ cautious: Trade risk delays rate hikes.
  • BoC stays on hold: Canada acknowledges potential recession in trade war scenario.
  • UK inflation drops to 2.6%, labor data softens. BoE likely to cut in May.

Week Ahead (April 21–25)

Key U.S. Events:

  • Economic Data:
    • Mon: Leading Indicators
    • Wed: New Home Sales, Crude Inventories
    • Thu: Jobless Claims, Durable Goods, Existing Home Sales
    • Fri: University of Michigan Sentiment
  • Earnings Highlights:
    • Tesla (Tue), Alphabet (Thu), IBM, Intel, P&G, Boeing, PepsiCo, Merck

Key Global Events:

  • Japan CPI: Friday – gauge of BoJ direction
  • Eurozone PMIs: Wednesday – growth and inflation barometer
  • Tariff Headlines: Potential trade deal news remains the primary wildcard

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

S&P 500 Key Levels – April 15

Happy Jackie Robinson Day!  What a great American. 

The rebound in the S&P 500 has thus far stalled at a key technical level—specifically the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the current correction from the recent highs, which stands at 5491.24. Today’s intraday high of 5450.41 failed to surpass the April 9th rebound peak of 5481.34, reinforcing the significance of the 5450–5500 zone as a formidable resistance range.

This area marks the midpoint of the decline and is closely watched by institutional players. A sustained break above this level would shift momentum in favor of the bulls; however, until then, it serves as a technical ceiling capping rallies.

From a trading perspective, market conditions have become increasingly erratic, bordering on untradable for directional players. Initiating short positions in this range carries elevated risk, as any unexpected de-escalation in U.S.-China tensions or a surprise tariff relief headline could ignite a sharp short-covering rally. Volatility remains headline-driven, and risk-reward is skewed to binary geopolitical outcomes.

The S&P 500 will likely remain range-bound between 5200 and 5500 in the near term as market participants await more definitive indications of the economic impact stemming from current policy decisions. In our view, as signs of strain begin to emerge—whether through softening macro data, downward earnings revisions, or tightening financial conditions—the index will face renewed selling pressure. This will send the index for a retest of the April 7th low, with an elevated risk it will not hold.

Stay frosty, folks. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment