Tweet el Xi and Tweet el Jung?

We are a bit confused about last night’s POTUS tweet asking China to remove tariffs immediately on agricultural products.   We know the president is under tremendous pressure from farmers who are losing their arse and their farms in his trade war.

“Farm loan delinquencies just hit the highest level that we have seen in 9 years.”  – WashPost, Feb 28th

Stumped

If negotiations are going so well and China is ready to agree to buy billions, and billions and billions of additional American goods, mostly ag, over the next several years to reduce the trade deficit, by extension doesn’t that mean the tariffs come off?

Or is Trump just looking for a good faith gesture by the Chinese for not slapping on additional tariffs yesterday?   The Chinese might find the tweet offensive as the tariffs Trump is asking them to reduce are mainly retaliatory from the first round of the trade war.  China could respond “we have already made a concession by not slapping on additional tariffs to retaliate against the tariffs the U.S. threatened to implement on March 1.”

Or is POTUS trying to score political points in the farm belt ensuring that he gets credit when a final deal is struck?  It will take some time for farmers to recover from the China trade shock and will still have to worry about an additional round of retaliatory tariffs if POTUS goes to war with Europe over autos.

Or is the president trying to put more pressure on Xi for additional concessions?

Or is not everything as awesome as Lary Kudlow projects in the China talks?

Or is Trump trying to look tough after the North Korean summit debacle?  By the way, the president did the right thing by walking but should have never been in Vietnam with KJU, in the first place.

Or is the fact we are talking about it exactly what motivates POTUS to tweet?

Or is the tweet just random impulse and nothing there?

Or…?   You decide, folks.

Posted in President Trump, Trade War, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Global Risk Monitor – March 1

RM_2

RM_1

Posted in Daily Risk Monitor, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Toon of the Day: Charlie Brown Negotiations

Come on now.  Put your politics aside and smile at this one.

For those not familiar with the comic strip, see here for some context.

Toon of the Day_Trump Charlie Brown.png

Hat Tip:  Social✽Fly   @socflyny

Posted in Cartoon of the Day, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Sector ETF Performance – March 1

ETF_Day

ETF_Week

ETF_Month

ETF_YTD

Posted in Sector ETF Peformance, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BTFD Liveth

https://twitter.com/occupywisdom/status/1099537165946683393?s=12

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Today In Baseball History

Miss #7.  The original “Natural.”

Posted in Sports, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ten Plus Great Weekend Reads – March 1

Highest Marginal Tax Rates

  • February In Review – Global Macro Monitor
  • U.S. Economy Grew Faster Than Expected at the End of 2018 – Fortune
  • The Global Economy May Have Bottomed Out Already, Goldman Says – Bloomberg
  • S&P500’s Five Hottest First Two Months Since 1950 – Global Macro Monitor
  • Donald Trump’s grand growth promises are evaporating – FT
  • A Better Populism, Raghuram Rajan – Project Syndicate
  • How a ‘Giant Ponzi Scheme’ Destroyed a Nation’s Economy – Bloomberg
  • This Is How the Palladium Boom Comes to an End – Bloomberg

 

Palladium

  • U.S. Prepares Final China Trade Deal as Hawks Urge Caution – Bloomberg
  • Fewer Americans view deficit reduction as a top priority as the nation’s red ink increases – Pew
  • Is the emerging market risk cycle restarting? – FT

 

EM_Flows

 

  • What’s wrong with MMT? – Medium
  • How a second Brexit referendum could be won — and lost – FT
  • Robot surgeons lack tactile sensation to replace humans – FT
  • This is how AI bias really happens—and why it’s so hard to fix – MIT Tech Review

Bonus

  • China lost 161 billionaires because its stock markets tanked – CNN
  • Buffettology: What four decades of correspondence from the Oracle of Omaha reveal – Economist
  • The age of the quant is coming to an end – eFinancialCareers
  • The Psychiatrist Who Believed People Could Tell the Future – New Yorker
  • That’s Tight’: Bryce Harper’s Signing With Phillies Received Muted Reaction from New Teammates – Sports Illustrated

Fed Chair Powell Says Concept of MMT Is ‘Just Wrong’

Posted in The Weekend Read, Uncategorized, Weekend Reads | Tagged , | 1 Comment

February In Review

Summary

  • EM x/ Turkey & India bond yields lower
  • U.S. 10-year yield up 9 bps on the month
  • U.S. 10 minus 2-year spread 5 bps steeper
  • U.S. credit spreads in big
  • Euro periphery x/ Italy tighter on the month
  • EM FX x/Asia weaker
  • Cable continues to rally
  • China stocks up yuuuuge. Shanghai rallies 13.79 percent in February
  • Russell leading U.S. stocks higher, up 5.08 percent
  • Commodities bid, led by Iron Ore and Crude.
  • Wheat getting crushed on lack of demand for U.S. exports.

 

Foreign Demand For U.S. Wheat Drying Up

Wheat_Futures

 

Month_Review

Posted in Uncategorized, Week in Review | Tagged , | 1 Comment

S&P500’s Five Hottest First Two Months Since 1950

The final trade is in for February and the S&P500 is up 11.07 percent in the first two months of the year.  It is the fourth strongest start for the S&P since 1950.

The table shows that such strong Jan/Feb price momentum has historically carried over into March.  In three of the other four years — 1987 the exception — the index finished the year higher than the February close.   Three of the top four are bounce years, where the S&P return was negative in the prior year.

The S&P is having trouble clearing and closing above the 2800 level, the December high and the last of the key Fibo retracement levels of the recent bear market.  In addition, 2815 is formidable resistance.

There you go, folks.  Ready to continue with the  momo challenge?

 

S&P500_JanFeb

 

S&P500_Chart

Posted in Equity, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 4 Comments

QOTD: Free Trade, Please…

Free_trade

 

The only policy that left- and right-wing populists can agree on to address economic decline is trade protectionism, which will make the world poorer.  A new type of populism that puts more trust in local communities may well have a greater chance of success – Raghuram Rajan

Posted in Quote of the Day, Trade War, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment